The InfoSec Blog

System Integrity: Context Is Everything

Navigation
  • About The Author
  • Presentations
  • System Integrity
You are here: Home › 11th Domain › Economic Impact: Patent trolls chase app developers out of the U.S
← He’s not Ian Paisley
Mistaken Thinking – Risk not threats →

Economic Impact: Patent trolls chase app developers out of the U.S

21 July, 2011 | Filed under: 11th Domain, Human Factors, Law, Politics & Economics, Risk, Social and tagged with: Economic, England, IntellectualVentures, off-shore, Patent, PatentTroll, United States, Wall Street

http://www.linuxfordevices.com/c/a/News/Kootol-joins-Lodsys-as-a-patent-troll/?kc=LNXDEVNL072111

The Debt ceiling crisis will pass; even if there is a crash, the USA can recover from it …

IF its core economic worth, that is its industrial productivity, is unharmed.

There are a number of ways this can be harmed, poor credit rating among them, lack of availability for investments.

But “off-shoring” has done a lot of harm, not because its bad, or any worse than Hammer’s “downsizing” was in principle. In practice there was a feeding frenzy and both were taken to excess and applied inappropriately and to a degree that was harmful. But then the USA has always had the attitude that if a little is good, a lot must be great.
Its how it legislation works and how cars and cities worked. It is hard to convince them otherwise.

But there gets to be a point where the engines of industry all get exported.

Look what happened in the UK.
Yes, Post-war England could not support being the heart of the empire; it had to let go of heavy industry since it no longer had cheap labour and the market for its products. But it took over 30 years and a lot of social and economic damage for the country to get with a new agenda; light engineering and knowledge-work. People don’t want to admit it, but Thatcher did a turn-around, shut down steel and shipbuilding and mines, all of which were lame ducks, nearly shut down the motor industry which was almost in the same category (but the mass unemployment resulting form that would have meant too much UI payout)

The resources released, the retraining resulted in a burst of economic growth that amazed Europe and made Maggie hated.

Sadly the Brits as a nation didn’t get the message, they thought everything was still all right, and continued downhill after she was gone.

The corner of Wall Street and Broadway, showin...

Image via Wikipedia

The USA has an incredibly mixed economy, just like it has an incredibly mixed ecology. Like the post are UK, the military deployment is a massive drain, but the UK cut back after Suez. Like the UK, the USA has seen that its auto industry can’t really compete, but also that it can’t afford to shut it down either, and won’t let it die a natural economic death.

Like “The City”, the USA sees “Wall Street” as being more important than the man on the street.

In a way, the Patent Trolls are parasites. They don’t add economic value, they impede industry and innovation, and foster the wealth of a sector that has no contribution to the core ongoing wealth of the nation – the lawyers.

Jacking up prices to the consumers to cover legal costs and licensing fees is clearly inflationary.

This is not good for the economy of ANY nation.

Related articles
  • ‘This American Life’ tackles patent trolls, lives to broadcast about it (engadget.com)
  • Connection Between Patent Troll Lodsys and Former Microsoft CTO/Microsoft Proxy Highlighted (techrights.org)
  • patent trolls and innovation (orgtheory.wordpress.com)
  • Patent Trolls Drive App Developers from U.S. Market (eff.org)
  • When Patents Attack – the NPR Version (yro.slashdot.org)
  • Mainstream Press is Turning Against Software Patents (techrights.org)
  • Microsoft Did Sponsor the World’s Biggest Patent Troll (More Lawsuits Come), Paul/Troll Allen Loses Case (techrights.org)
  • Patent troll Lodsys files more lawsuits (teleread.com)
  • Software Patents Might Inevitably Die as Economic Impact is Realised (techrights.org)
  • The cost of patent trolls (blogs.reuters.com)
Enhanced by Zemanta

Did you like this article? Share it with your friends!

Written by Anton Aylward

Security Evangelist

Visit my Website
← He’s not Ian Paisley
Mistaken Thinking – Risk not threats →

One Response to "Economic Impact: Patent trolls chase app developers out of the U.S"

  1. ajr says:
    25 July, 2011 at 10:34 am

    Patent trolls follow the strategy Musashi called “injuring the corners”:
    http://www.chinastrategies.com/combatstrategies.htm taking on the smaller
    targets and then using the precedents set to extort from the larger ones.

    In self-defence, the (creative) industry should adopt 2 strategies:

    1) An office for pre-emptive monitoring of patent applications, to blow
    the whistle and demonstrate prior art as soon as the trolls file
    applications. That will deprive them of a) the element of surprise, and b)
    ammunition.

    2) Defensive pre-formation of action classes to launch counter-suits.

    There would be a cost associated with this, but if the big outfits pooled
    what they already spend in routine legal fees and F-Off money on a single
    office, they could probably administer the class rosters for the industry
    and still save a portion. The only risk would be some idiot in the DoJ
    trying an anti-trust suit.

    If an attempt to file an extortion patent reliably and immediately
    produced an expensive outbreak of counter-lawyering, the trolls might be
    tempted to lurk under other bridges.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Calendar

July 2011
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Aug »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Search

Archives

Tag Cloud

Access control Apple Botnet Business Business Continuity Planning Certified Information Systems Security Professional CISSP Computer security Confidence trick Consultants controls Donn Parker Editing English language FMEA fraud HP Individual Standards Information security infosec International Organization for Standardization IPad IPhone ISO/IEC 27001 Laptop laptops Law Linux Malware Management Microsoft Open source owasp Policy Risk Risk analysis Risk assessment Risk Management Security Site Management Standards statistics Technology United States Vulnerability

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Popular Pages

  • The Classical Risk Equation
  • Separation of Duties: Infosec, IT and Audit
  • “Cybercrime” is still Crime and “Cyberfraud” is still Fraud
  • Risk Analysis makes no sense … Does it?
  • Are *you* ready to give up yet?
  • Why InfoSec Positions go unfilled
  • Security
  • Risk

Categories

Advisories & Vulnerbilities

  • bugtraq @ insecure.org
  • SANS Security Alerts
  • SANS Storm Center
  • Secunia Advisories
  • Symantec Security Response – Advisories
  • Symantec Security Response – Resent Viruses

Blogroll

  • Augusto Paes de Barros
  • Bob Johnston
  • Daniel Accioly Rosa
  • Deep Litter
  • DHS Daily Report
  • Eduardo Neves
  • Emergent Properties
  • Gary Hinson
  • Hayden’s Harangues
  • Martin McKeay
  • Schneier on Security
  • The Quiet Earth
  • The Security Team
  • Watchguard Wire

Security Links

  • CERT-CC
  • E2K Security
  • focus-ids @ insecure.org
  • fulldisclosure @ insecure.org
  • Identity mangement news
  • Incidents
  • InfoWorld- Security
  • isn @ insecure.org
  • joatBlog
  • Kill-HUP.com
  • Mark O’Neill’s Radio Weblog
  • microsoft @ insecure.org
  • Microsoft TechNet – Security
  • MSDN- Security
  • Network World Fusion NetFlash
  • Network World on Privacy
  • Network World on Security
  • Network World on Wireless Security
  • nmap-hackers @ insecure.org
  • Scott Granneman- Intellectual Property
  • Scott Granneman- Privacy
  • Scott Granneman- Security
  • Scott Loftesness- Digital Identity
  • Security Blog
  • Stupid Security
  • THE Network Security Blog – Geek Troy Jessup
  • Wi-Fi Networking News
  • Wifi Security Project

© 2013 The InfoSec Blog

Powered by Esplanade Theme by One Designs and WordPress