The InfoSec Blog

System Integrity: Without Integrity you don’t have Security

August 28th, 2006

Are we really at risk from Snacks on a Plane?

The Sunday Herald in England has this marvelous article:-
http://www.sundayherald.com/57459

I love that headline! - Falacious Airline Risks: Indeed!
This is a long article that covers a number of points raised in and some information security forums I participate in and is begining to creep in to the awareness of other journalists. That the enhanced security since 9/11 is not just a cost to the airlines but also has an economic impact in other ways - loss of business and hence hence loss of jobs and hence bankrupcies.
One idea I would like to mention is the possibility that flights between the UK and USA will just not happen. People will fly between Canada and Continental Europe and take surface transport for the difference. Heathrow will cease to be a hub for transatlantic travel and revert to being farmland, crippling the UK economy and what is left of its aircraft industry. Of course Canada, Ireland and some European countries will take up the slack and have a more logical and less ‘politically correct’ (see the article’s note about ‘”positive” profiling’) attitude and hence not aggravate travelers and drive discount airlines into bankruptcy. The deregulation of the airline industry has seen the loss of many carriers a it has become more price agressive. A side effect is that we no longer have the confort in tourist class that we once did, “proper” meals on plates with knives and forks and napkins. The long security queues were just more of this growing discomfort, raising the baseline.

The statistics are in - tourist airline travel is falling off.
This is a Good article, well worth reading.
Read the rest of this entry »

August 17th, 2006

Realistic Risk Assesment

I found the contents of this very interesting:
http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv27n3/v27n3-5.pdf

Example:

Accordingly, it would seem to be reasonable for those in charge of our safety to inform the public about how many airliners would have to crash before flying becomes as dangerous as driving the same distance in an automobile. It turns out that someone has made that calculation: University of Michigan transportation researchers Michael Sivak and Michael Flannagan, in an article last year in American Scientist, wrote that they determined there would have to be one set of September 11 crashes a month for the risks to balance out. More generally, they calculate that an American’s chance of being killed in one nonstop airline flight is about one in 13 million (even taking the September 11 crashes into account). To reach that same level of risk when driving on America’s safest roads — rural interstate highways — one would have to travel a mere 11.2 miles.

Aw come on! You have to keep the insurance business, auto-mechanics and scrapyards in business. Never mind undertakers. They all contribute positively to the economy. Probably more so than the DHS.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Zemanta Pixie
|